An elderly Oak Park woman’s longtime home might be sold due to unfinished construction. She’s fighting to keep it.

Wanda Clark stood in the driveway of her Oak Park home on Wednesday morning surrounded by family as she held back tears. The 71-year-old is fighting to keep the house she’s owned since 1995. But because of unfinished construction and repairs, it could be sold without her approval.

“We're trying to ask that they do not sell my home away from me, because I don't want to feel like — I don't want to be homeless,” Clark said through tears at a press conference, joined by community members and organizations trying to help. “I want to spend my best days in my home.”

The house has sat vacant for two years and has seen better days. In 2005, Clark says she took out a loan to add two bedrooms and a bathroom on top of her garage. Her daughter’s husband was killed, and she wanted to give her family a place to live. 

But she says the contractor took off with the money before completing the renovation. The addition on top of the garage sat bare for more than a decade, with the roof incomplete and wood frame exposed to the weather.

Clark, who works as a janitor for Sacramento County, lived with the property like that for years, saying she never missed a mortgage payment. She said the contractor later died, and she never saw a dime.

In April 2019, the city said it boarded up the home and that the Sacramento Municipal Utilities District shut off the power because of the property’s “dangerous condition and structural damage.” Last October, the city told Clark it would move to appoint a “receiver,” or someone to legally oversee the property in lieu of Clark. But it held off, telling her instead to submit building plans to complete the renovation. 

That didn’t happen, according to the city, and in April the courts appointed a receiver, who filed paperwork to put the home on the market. There’s now a “for sale” sign in the front yard.

Community members and organizations stood with Wanda Clark, 71, and her family in the driveway of her Oak Park home as she spoke about her fight to keep her house during a press conference on Oct. 20, 2021.Kris Hooks / CapRadio

 

On Wednesday, several Sacramento organizations — including the Sacramento NAACP, the local Habitat for Humanity group, the Sacramento-Sierra Building Trades, Sacramento Area Congregations Together and more — spoke in the driveway of her former home.

Clark has been living on her sister’s couch across the street from her home since 2019. 

Her younger sister Terri Austin said there has been work done to the house over the years, including new kitchen flooring and updating the bathroom, but nothing to the unfinished structure atop the garage because of the cost.

“When you’re paying bills and surviving, some things don’t make the cut,” Austin said.

She says she’s witnessed her sister stress to the point of extreme weight loss, as she works extra hours to find a way to save her home. 

“It is going to be impossible for my sister to watch other people move in here,” Austin said. “That’s gonna take her life.”

Terri Austin gives a tour of her sister Wanda Clark’s home, which has sat vacant for years. Clark has been fighting to keep the house she’s owned since 1995. But because of unfinished construction and repairs, it could be sold without her approval.Kris Hooks / CapRadio

Peter Lemos, Sacramento’s code compliance chief, said in a statement that the city has worked with Clark for years, even waiving thousands of dollars in fees levied against her.

“Unfortunately, the house remains in a dangerous condition both to the property owner and the neighborhood,” Lemos said. 

He says that, in addition to structural issues and toxic mold, there has been “illegal activity” at the home. 

“At this phase, the Court has ruled that the house should be put into receivership. Nevertheless, the City remains committed to continuing its work to help secure a positive outcome for the property owner,” Lemos said.

Clark and her family insist there has been nothing unlawful at her house.

Kelli Trapani, the spokesperson for Sacramento’s code enforcement department, said city inspectors met with Clark six times in 2011 to aid in gaining compliance. 

In the 10 years since that first meeting, Trapini said the city was in contact “at least 40 times to assist [Clark] in making the property safe and bringing it back into compliance.”

And it appears the city will attempt to keep working with Clark.

Betty Williams with the Sacramento NAACP said at the Wednesday press conference that she spoke with City Manager Howard Chan, who agreed to meet with Clark to find a way to solve the issue. 

City spokesperson Tim Swanson said that Chan agreed to meet with the NAACP and Clark.

“This is a shame. It shouldn't have taken this for us to come together to make this happen,” Williams said.

As Clark continues to watch her home of 25 years sit empty and boarded up, she’s pessimistic with little hope to save a property that she desperately wants to keep.

“I'm still fighting to stay in my home. That's my goal — to stay at my home,” Clark said. “Not to have to walk away and watch people run in and out of my house, because they want to sell my property from underneath because they feel like I'm not worthy of them to fix my home.”

Kris Hooks

The Paycheck Protection Program Was Meant To Help Places Of Worship In Need. In Sacramento, It Mostly Helped Ones In White Neighborhoods.

This investigation was produced in partnership with Reveal and NPR’s California Newsroom.

On an empty street corner in old north Sacramento, Pastor Alex Vaiz remembers the church he used to run. He tells stories about lively harvest festivals that drew hundreds of people, and City Council debates his church hosted inside a warehouse-like building. 

Vaiz used to run Vida Church, a mostly Latino, immigrant-serving church in this underserved part of the city. But the pandemic was hard on his church. Parishioners lost their jobs and stopped giving, in-person attendance did not lead to online viewership when government-mandated lock-downs closed houses of worship. In April 2020, they lost their lease. In February of this year, Vaiz and his wife gave their final Vida Church sermon and shuttered for good. 

“Our budget just fell all the way, 60 percent, and it just continued to go further,” Vaiz said. 

The closure was painful, because connection — what he sees as the center of worship — was more important than ever during the pandemic.

“That's the biggest part of ministry. It's connecting with your people, connecting with your congregation, connecting with the community, connecting with people that, they know you're there and they can go to you,” he said.

Vida Church is like many churches in neighborhoods that have a high proportion of people of color, and in particular those with large numbers of Latino residents. A massive federal lending effort, the Paycheck Protection Program was designed to help religious institutions. But an analysis by CapRadio and NPR’s California Newsroom found that in Sacramento, at least, those funds largely bypassed churches in diverse communities like north Sacramento, with relief dollars flowing primarily to neighborhoods where white residents predominate.

Despite the fact that the city is nearly evenly split between white majority neighborhoods and neighborhoods where people of color are in the majority, our investigation found that churches in white-majority neighborhoods got three times as much federal funding. 

 

Religious institutions in neighborhoods that are majority people of color, like Vida Church, got just $7 million in loans from the federal government, while churches in white majority neighborhoods got nearly $20 million. 

Vida Church didn’t even apply. It had no one on staff to handle an application, and they heard that they were eligible too late in the year. Latino and Asian churches faced language barriers that deterred them from applying, and many smaller churches serving people of color lacked the computers and scanners they needed to send financial documents quickly to banks. Some business owners also worried about taking out a loan in the middle of an economic crisis. 

Should Banks Have Done More?

The Small Business Administration, the government agency in charge of distributing PPP dollars, declined to be interviewed for this story. Instead, the agency sent a statement, saying it was “deeply committed to getting funds into the hands of struggling small business owners as quickly as possible and to ensuring the economic aid is accessible to all that are eligible.” 

A representative of the the California Bankers Association, an industry trade group, told CapRadio and NPR’s California Newsroom that our analysis did not prove systemic discrimination.

“I don’t think that all speaks to characterizing a bank’s intentions or, with respect to especially racism,” said the organization’s spokeswoman Beth Mills, who added that the banks did outreach to all communities. 

“There couldn’t be a stronger advocate for equality and serving everybody that needs to be served to promote economic growth and vitality within their own households,” she said. 

Churches In Underserved Neighborhoods: More Than A Place To Worship

The former site of Vida Church in Sacramento now has a new tenant.Andrew Nixon / CapRadio

For Pastor Vaiz, Vida Church represented a special calling. They ran a food bank and held events for the community. Many members of his congregation were recent immigrants. Claudia Ramos-Chile attended Vida Church for 13 years and said it felt like a home away from home for her. 

“The same feeling I had leaving my family and friends 30 years ago in El Salvador, feeling homesick about it, that’s the way it felt, it felt like I left my family,” Ramos-Chile said. “It’s painful not to gather, not to have that community with them.” 

Vida Church isn’t the only Latino-led church that suffered during the pandemic. Gabby Trejo, executive director of nonprofit Sacramento Area Congregations Together, said Latino-led churches in particular missed out on these federal loans. 

“The Latino faith leaders, they lead much smaller congregations and are having to be the admin, the pastor, the counselor, the everything,” Trejo said. “It might have been more difficult for them to actually access these loans and be thinking about those loans as they were also serving families and individuals.”

Trejo adds that a lot of Latino-led congregations also didn’t have big staff or a financial team to help them apply for the Paycheck Protection Program. Even though the application was fairly short, Vaiz and other leaders of Black, Latino and Asian congregations worried it would be a complicated government program. 

In addition, many churches that served African Americans and Latinos suffered financially, because those specific communities suffered financially. These two groups were the two most likely to have lost their jobs during the pandemic. 

“It is frustrating. When we look at the numbers of who got the loans and we look at how Latino faith leaders were left out and, you know, African American faith leaders were left out,” Trejo said. 

Churches In White Neighborhoods Expanded

But for churches in majority white neighborhoods, the story of how loans were distributed looks very different. 

Capitol Christian Center, a megachurch with a sprawling lawn and a large fountain at the entrance, is located in the majority white neighborhood of Rosemont. It received one of the largest federal loans given to any religious institution in Sacramento: $1.7 million. 

Interactive: Lookup which Sacramento County Churches received PPP Loans

Laine Alves, one of the pastors at Capital Christian, said the loan helped keep employees on payroll and even allowed it to make some new hires. 

“We hired a new worship leader during COVID. He just started in February of this year actually,” she said. “The church is here to support in all ways, we say we’re made up physically, spiritually, socially and academically.” 

With the help of the federal aid, Capital Christian’s K-12 school was able to safely re-open during the pandemic, a “huge win” for them, Alves added.

Capital Christian has hundreds of employees on their payroll and a full financial team that handled their Paycheck Protection Program application. While the loan has helped their church grow during a difficult time, it’s also helped them continue their community service work, like a monthly food drive for parishioners. 

Because they were able to meet the federal government’s criteria for using the money, their loan was completely forgiven.

Capital Christian isn’t unusual. Other churches also located in wealthier, white majority neighborhoods like East Sacramento received a large proportion of this federal loan money. 

The Table at Central United Methodist Church in East Sacramento received a more modest amount than Capital Christian, about $47,000, but even they mentioned having had on-staff accountants who helped shepherd the application through. 

“It helped us keep the musicians on payroll. We also have a nominal small maintenance crew. And it was wonderful to have, because otherwise you have a situation where, you know, folks are going to have to look at options,” said Bob Martinez, a board member of The Table. 

He said that while church donations did not decrease for his congregation, they were still grateful for the help the loan gave them. 

“We were very lucky, the contributions continued, the membership continued,” he said. 

Redlining And Its Lasting Legacy

Some experts see the distribution of Paycheck Protection Program loans as a continuation of the legacy of redlining. 

Redlining is a racist lending practice where federal government employees drew lines on maps and shaded in red neighborhoods where people of color lived, to signify these areas were too “hazardous” to lend in. 

“If you were to overlay a redlining map with a PPP loan map, you see the same kind of serial harm happening time and time again,” said Paulina Gonzalez-Brito, executive director of the California Reinvestment Coalition. Her organization helps communities of color connect with banking institutions. 

On redlining maps from the 1930s, the area around Vida Church was shaded yellow, which means “definitely declining.” Government planners warned they were concerned about the neighborhood being “infiltrated” by immigrants from Portugal and the presence of “1 or 2 Negro families.” In 2020, very few places of worship in this neighborhood received PPP loans.

If you were to overlay a redlining map with a PPP loan map, you see the same kind of serial harm happening time and time again.
– Paulina Gonzalez-Brito, executive director of the California Reinvestment Coalition

Gonzalez-Brito says it’s no coincidence that religious institutions in this area received very few federal loans, while white neighborhoods got the majority of this money.   

“This really is about the long history of relationships or a lack of relationships that financial institutions have had with Black, indigenous and people of color,” she said. 

She added that this legacy of discrimintaion puts the burden of responsibility on banks today. 

“The government or banks will say that these things just happen accidentally, that they're not in any way the way that they design programs, whether at the government level or at the financial institution level. And it's a way of washing their hands of responsibility,” Gonzalez-Brito said. “The way that discrimination happens or racism happens, it’s never by accident, it’s either by design or it’s baked into the system for generations.”

Pastor Alex Vaiz said he’s currently trying to get funding to reopen Vida Church in the fall. Standing outside his former church, the memories flood back. 

“We’d use all of that space for large Halloween events, we’d fill it up with jump houses, it was really neat because people would come out from the community and be able to hang out with us,” Vaiz said. “Lot of things, lot of memories.”

His church is looking to become a part of the Presbyterian Diocese and to open up in a new building in the fall. Until then, they’ll be holding services in peoples’ homes as they search for a more permanent location. 

Sarah Mizes-Tan

Guest Commentary: ‘Violence in Sacramento Requires Investment That Matches Scope of Issue’

(This commentary is provided by Sacramento ACT’s LIVE FREE Committee. ACT is an alliance of faith leaders, congregants, and community members committed to pushing criminal justice reform through faith-based organizing.)

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, Sacramento’s Black and Brown communities require dedicated investment from the City of Sacramento. As the city re-opens, it is bracing for a wave of violence, the leading edge of which we are witnessing in our own homes and neighborhoods. This is largely due to a lack of opportunities for our youth and insufficient resources to cover basic needs for their families.

The pattern of disinvestment and neglect in vulnerable communities that the city has demonstrated for decades must end. Those who bore the brunt of the COVID-19 pandemic deserve investment of American Rescue Plan funds into their communities to begin to heal.

Rather than exhausting funds to mitigate the lethal consequences of gun violence, or sending more police into our neighborhoods, the city must invest in communities to alleviate the underlying causes and prevent gun violence from happening.

The city must act proactively and urgently.

A shift in the city’s gang violence prevention strategy must prioritize long-term, adequate funding and evidence-based community programs, in order to properly address the 50 percent increase in gun homicides Sacramento has experienced during COVID-19, part of a significant nationwide uptick in gun violence.

Last month, the City Council proposed to increase the Sacramento Police Department’s budget by over $8 million on top of its current budget of $156 million, and then proposed a mere $1 million for violence prevention, the same amount that’s been provided annually since 2016.

Moreover, the Department of Violence Prevention proposed defunding two CBO’s currently doing intervention work, Advance Peace and Healing the Hood. Effective violence prevention must target those who are at highest risk for being both victims and perpetrators of violence to effectively engage and provide them with wraparound services that center conflict resolution, mentoring, job training, and trauma healing.

Both organizations have strategies and relationships with impacted community members that cannot be replaced, as well as data and evaluation reports to prove their impact.

The scope of violence in Sacramento is not one that can be solved by punitive, carceral measures. We have witnessed Sacramento law enforcement try this approach for over a decade and fail to significantly lower gun violence rates in our most vulnerable neighborhoods.

To approve the proposed violence prevention strategy without amendment would be to risk the deaths of many Sacramento residents. The issue of gun violence is not a one-solution problem. Prioritizing arrest and incarceration only fuels this cycle, whereas community programs work to resolve the root causes, and as such require a long-term strategy.

As such, we request that the city:

  1. Commit to a minimum investment of eight percent of ARP funding ($9.7 million) towards community-based violence intervention and prevention programs, in line with federal guidelines. Considering each gun homicide costs the city $1.2 million, this investment of ARP funds has the potential to reap substantial societal dividends.

  2. Expand the number of organizations that receive funding, and prioritize those that have demonstrated long-standing commitment to Sacramento’s most vulnerable populations.

  3. Be transparent in the process with which grant recipient organizations are chosen (criteria, panelists).

A unique opportunity presents itself in the $121 million the City of Sacramento will be receiving, of which the U.S. Treasury ARP Spending Guidelines suggests should be spent on “evidence-based community violence intervention programs to prevent violence and mitigate the increase in violence during the pandemic.”

We look forward to working with the City to ensure investment in programs that will truly meet the needs of communities who have struggled most under the dual weights of the pandemic and of gun violence.

'It's Heartbreaking.': Sacramento County’s Affordable Housing Shortage Continues To Squeeze Lowest-Income Renters

Erica Jaramillo knows what it’s like to struggle to find affordable housing. 

At the end of July, her lease will expire in the Oak Park duplex she’s called home for six years. Her landlord is selling right in the middle of a red hot real estate market, so the chance of renewing is slim.

“It creates panic for me,” the 33-year-old Sacramento native told CapRadio. “It’s like the only thing I’m thinking about the rest of the day. Because all I have in the back of my head is ‘July 31st, July 31st.’”

A recent report found many of Sacramento County’s working-class residents simply aren’t making enough to keep up with these changes. Renters must now make about twice the state’s minimum wage, or nearly $27 per hour, just to afford the county’s average rent of $1,392. 

Jaramillo, a housing advocate who works as a program analyst for the state, said she’ll need to pay hundreds more every month to stay in the neighborhood — which like most of Sacramento is experiencing change as home prices continue to climb and some lower-income residents are forced out. 

Housing advocates say few places are feeling the effects of displacement more than Oak Park. The median sales price for a home this year is $357,500, a 600% increase from a decade ago, according to Ryan Lundquist, a real estate data analyst and appraiser. 

Oak Park homes “sold in an average of 20 days. But the real stat is half of all homes sold in 7 days so far,” Lundquist wrote in an email. 

Jaramillo’s current landlord, Anastasia Kryukova, said she doesn’t necessarily have to move, but acknowledged “there’s no way for me to predict” whether the new owner will choose to renew the lease.  

Jaramillo said the sale and non-renewal of her lease are, in effect, forcing her out. 

She said she’ll sell her car or take a second job to afford higher rent and to sock money away to purchase a home someday. But many don’t have that option. 

“It’s being uprooted,” she said. “This is home for me.” 

Sacramento County’s Lack Of Affordable Homes

The Sacramento County 2021 Affordable Housing Needs Report by the nonprofit California Housing Partnership found the county has a shortfall of 58,383 affordable homes for its lowest-income renters. That means a shortage for retail workers, janitors, child care workers and home health aides and more — all who make approximately $10 per hour less than what’s needed to afford the average rent.

The California Housing Partnership advocates for affordable housing and produces statewide data tools for housing research.

The group’s report considers a rental home “affordable” if a household spends no more than 30% of their income on rent and utilities.

The region’s affordable housing shortfall has hovered near 60,000 in each of the partnership’s reports, which date back to 2017. Statewide, there’s a need for well over 1 million additional affordable rental homes, according to the partnership. 

“To see that number on paper, it’s heartbreaking really,” Jaramillo said of the housing shortage. Jaramillo sits on the board of the grassroots group Sacramento Investment Without Displacement (SIWD) which works to prevent new development from uprooting residents. “What does that say about our futures?” 

SIWD sued UC Davis last year over the university’s Aggie Square development, a billion-dollar science and tech hub that’s expected to bring up to 5,000 jobs to the area and give Sacramento an economic boost. The group, which consists of residents who live in the area, said it would drive real estate prices even higher, making the neighborhood unaffordable for existing low-income residents and businesses. 

SIWD dropped its lawsuit last month after Sacramento officials promised to ensure all aspects of the community benefits agreement are met — specifically the $50 million investment to create nearby affordable housing. The city, UC Davis and Aggie Square developer Wexford Science + Technology announced the agreement in March..   

Aggie Square would sit between the neighborhoods of Elmhurst, Med Center, Oak Park and Tahoe Park, the latter two seeing housing costs dramatically increase over the years. 

“Sacramento is suffering in an unprecedented way,” said Cathy Creswell, board president for the nonprofit Sacramento Housing Alliance, which advocates for affordable housing. “It used to be that we were considered more affordable, especially compared to the Bay Area. But in the last few years, we’ve had the highest rent increases of any market in the nation.” 

The report by the housing partnership suggests Sacramento County’s poorest residents are in desperate need. It found 81% of the county’s extremely-low income households, or those who earn less than one-third the area’s median income, already pay more than half their earnings on housing and utilities.  

“It really means people are one crisis, one lost paycheck away from homelessness,” Matt Schwartz, president and CEO of the California Housing Partnership, said during a Facebook Live event announcing the report last week.  

Rent hikes, combined with pandemic-related job losses, have driven numerous Sacramento families out of their homes over the past year, said Gabby Trejo, executive director of the community-based group Sacramento Area Congregations Together, or ACT. Trejo also is a board member with SIWD.

“We’re getting calls from families all the time,” she said, explaining many calls are from the poorest in the region, including those who are undocumented. “The reality is with COVID, we have been not just devastated by the loss of lives and jobs. But it’s creating a bigger gap — a bigger wealth gap and making it more difficult to stay in our region.” 

‘More Money Than We’ve Ever Had Before’

Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg called the report’s findings “both stunning and not surprising. We’ve known about this for a long time and it is not just a community problem here in Sacramento. It is our state’s biggest problem.”  

Even so, Steinberg said he’s more encouraged now than in the past because more federal and state funds are available to address the need. The mayor said he expects the region to use the money “to produce tens of thousands of additional units of housing and also prevent the displacement of people who are currently housed.”

Steinberg pointed to efforts like rental assistance, which helps tenants who lost jobs due to COVID-19 pay back rent. The city also set aside $5 million for “anti-displacement strategies” in Oak Park to help renters and homeowners stay in their homes as part of Aggie Square community benefits agreement

“There still might not be enough money (to address all the need), but there is more money than we’ve ever had before,” Steinberg said. 

The housing partnership report made several statewide policy recommendations for addressing the shortfall of affordable homes. It called for creating a $10 billion statewide housing bond to pay for five years of affordable housing for low-income families and people experiencing homelessness.

It also recommends new apartment and condominium developments be built in commercial and mixed-use zones when at least 20% of the homes are affordable to low-income households.

Additionally, it called for speeding up the construction of affordable homes and reducing uncertainty and costs for developers. To accomplish this, the state should create one decision-making process for awarding affordable housing development funds, the report said. Currently, four separate agencies must approve the funds. 

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation on May 20 to streamline the review process for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which could fast-track housing projects that cost at least $15 million as long as they include affordable housing.  

CEQA’s goal is to mitigate environmental damage caused by construction, but developers say it can unnecessarily slow down projects and sometimes discourage building altogether. The new law fast-tracks the review process for and will also apply to some manufacturing and renewable energy projects.

Chris Nichols

Aggie Square project moves forward with community benefits partnership

The "Community Benefits Partnership Agreement" includes a $50 million investment in affordable housing.

Author: Lena Howland (ABC10)

Published: 6:53 PM PDT May 11, 2021

Updated: 6:53 PM PDT May 11, 2021

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The City of Sacramento is moving forward with a $1 billion plan to expand the Sacramento campus of U.C. Davis. It's called the Aggie Square project in the Oak Park and Tahoe Park areas.

The project is a major investment, but it has not come without controversy.

Before Aggie Square got the green light from the city, multiple neighborhood associations expressed their concerns about traffic, parking and locals getting priced out of the market.

The city wanted to move forward, citing the billions of dollars the project would bring to Sacramento, along with up to 10,000 jobs.

The city was even sued by the Sacramento Investment Without Displacement Group, but that lawsuit was dropped minutes before the project got approved.

In a unanimous vote on Tuesday afternoon, Sacramento City Council members agreed on a settlement with a group that had filed a lawsuit over the Aggie Square project, creating what they're calling a "Community Benefits Partnership Agreement."

"I have affordable rent right now but me and the tenant above me, because it's a duplex, were told that she's going to sell it," Erica Jaramillo, an Oak Park renter and board member on Sacramento Investment Without Displacement said.  

Jaramillo has been living in Oak Park for the past six years with her lease ending in May but she says the house she's renting has already gone on the market. 

"Sure you can make double the profit right now but where is the responsibility for people who are relying to have a place to sleep?" she said.

It's stories like this one that SIWD is trying to avoid as the Aggie Square project moves forward. 

"We lose the flavor and culture in our communities when people are forced out of where they grew up," Tamie Dramer, Executive Director of Organize Sacramento and board member of SIWD said.

That's why the city agreed on a settlement with the group, creating what they're calling a "Community Benefits Partnership Agreement."

The agreement says $50 million should be put toward affordable housing in the area and the council started to make good on that promise right away on Tuesday, by unanimously voting on a $15 million loan to build a 225-unit affordable housing complex on Stockton Boulevard in the former Jon's Home Furnishers lot. 

"That is so important and imperative, $50 million can make a difference for so many families in our region to ensure that they're housed and we know that we have a housing shortage," Gabby Trejo, Executive Director of Sacramento ACT said.

Another part of their deal is 20% of all jobs created because of the Aggie Square project will be going to people living in impacted zip codes.  

"To us, that is a huge win because we want to make sure that residents have access to these jobs, that we are looking at the future so that residents don't have to drive too far to their jobs so they can actually spend time with their families," Trejo said.

It's a bit of a 180 since the lawsuit was first filed, but in the end, advocates are hopeful community members will now have a better seat at the table.  

"It's a big deal for Sacramento to not only get this project but that this coalition came along to make it a better project, to make it fit the community to make sure the community is included in all of the aspects of the development of this project," Dramer said.

For Local Faith Leaders, Accountability Is An Answered Prayer

by GENOA BARROWApril 22, 2021

For centuries, African Americans have called on a higher power to get through times of strife and struggle. The continued impact of racism in America and demonstrations that Black lives don’t in fact matter to some have been the subject of many a prayer.

Local faith based leaders say while a historic guilty verdict in the Derek Chauvin trial of the killing of George Floyd was an answered prayer, there is much action still ahead to heal this nation.

Local pastor Joy Johnson called Tuesday a “monumental day”  for Blacks in America, one that “calls for celebration and commemoration.”

“Finally, finally, finally, a group of 12 jurors have seen what Black mothers saw every time one of our Black and brown children had their lives taken at the hands of someone who was sworn to protect and serve. Finally, someone had the courage to tell the truth of what they clearly saw,” said Rev. Dr. Johnson.

Rev. Dr. Johnson is immediate past president of Sacramento Area Congregations Together (ACT). She also directs trauma healing and restoration programs for families and survivors of neighborhood violence through her Dr. Joy Johnson Ministries.

“Over these many years, our faith communities have prayed for justice in so many instances and today we feel that justice has begun. This is an answer to much prayer. Now, we pray that justice will continue and spill over like a living stream.”

Rev. Kevin Ross, senior minister and CEO of the Unity of Sacramento International Spiritual Center, said he was optimistic going into Tuesday’s announcement. Rev. Ross, a Sacramento ACT board member, was arrested in March 2019, during a peaceful protest in East Sacramento’s affluent Fab 40’s area over the district attorney’s decision not to file charges against two police officers who killed Stephon Clark locally a year prior.

“While I braced myself for the worst, I prayed for the best,” Rev. Ross shared.

The guilty verdict in the Derek Chauvin trial was the proverbial pulling of a global sociological pressure release valve and for the first time in nearly a year, the world watched as the jury removed Chauvin’s knee off of George Floyd’s neck.  “For a moment we could all breathe again,” Rev. Ross said.

“The jury was able to render such a bold stand because virtually the whole world stood up and said in substance, ‘Not on my watch.’ However, it should not have to take the whole world to stand up to convict one bad cop.”

Echoing many other community leaders, Rev. Ross says the verdict was a victory, but isn’t justice. 

“This case created relief, but we must not rest until we radically change the system that gave a White officer such confidence that he would not be convicted, even if he kneeled on the neck of a Black man in broad daylight, while being filmed for 9 minutes and 29 seconds,” Rev. Ross said. 

The time that Chauvin placed his knee to Floyd’s neck was originally estimated at 8 minutes and 46 seconds. During the trial, that time was revealed to be even longer.

“What we have achieved is a new precedent in accountability and the jury has issued notice to bad actors in law enforcement that you can and will be held accountable for their heinous and hate-filled crimes against Black bodies,” Rev. Ross said.

Placing federal laws like the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act and the Emmett Till Antilynching Act, he says, will allow the country to move beyond accountability to justice.  

“But, real talk, when the verdict was announced, I took a shout break and partied with the ancestors, because for a moment, our union became one percent more perfect,” Rev. Ross admitted. 

Dr. Tecoy Porter, who leads Genesis Baptist Church in the Meadowview area and the Sacramento Chapter of Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, said he too is praying for systemic change moving forward.

“That’s what I’m all about, because I’ve been there,” Dr. Porter said. “I remember vividly standing in the living room with Sequita Thompson, Sequette Clark and Stevante Clark, talking to them, seeing their reaction after the DA told them that Stephon Clark committed ‘suicide by cop.’”

Genesis Church is a stone’s throw from Ms. Thompson’s backyard where her grandson Stephon was fatally shot. Dr. Porter recalls asking Stephon’s brother, Stevante, what he wanted to do in that moment. He provided the family with a forum to address the city and the nation, from his church.

“As for ministers, pastors and any community leaders in this space, when you’re dealing with family members who have been victimized in this manner and have lost loved ones, all you can do is preach your version of faith to the people and then pray that faith manifests itself in some form or fashion during the course of our lives,” Dr. Porter shared.

Dr. Porter is a native of Minnesota and helped plan George Floyd’s funeral services. He’s travelled back to his home state several times to pray for and with Floyd’s family. He calls the verdict a “major milestone” that lifts a heavy burden off them. He prays that others will see similar outcomes.

Rev. Dr. Johnson said she was disturbed by past court proceedings. 

“Since the acquittal of George Zimmerman for the murder to Trayvon Martin, I have felt that this nation was playing a horrible trick on what our own ears could hear and what our very eyes could see. As one after another unarmed Black men or women were shot dead by law enforcement only to have all charges dropped over and over again,” she said.

“America was telling us that the breath and life inside the body of a Black person was expendable and/or worthless. The more we yelled that the lives of our sons and daughters are not expendable, the more we heard how expendable they are. We have been lied to over

and over again.”

Rev. Dr. Johnson said her prayers for the future center on a “reckoning of a nation that was built on systems of false supremacy and is being sustained on all the lies that we’ve been told.”

Immigration agencies no longer using 'illegal alien' as part of terminology changes

U.S. immigration enforcement agencies are updating some of their terminologies as the Biden administration sent out a memo with guidance on the preferred and more "inclusive language" that CBP and ICE should consider adopting.


Maricela De La Cruz

Reporter

SACRAMENTO, Calif. —

U.S. immigration enforcement agencies are updating some of their terminologies as the Biden administration sent out a memo with guidance on the preferred and more "inclusive language" that CBP and ICE should consider adopting.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection sent out a memorandum to KCRA 3 on their changes.

As this guidance is followed by federal immigration agencies, Holly Cooper, co-director of the immigration law clinic at UC Davis School of Law said, "It's interesting because this is coming on the heels of the verdict today that we got in the Chauvin trial, and I think what there is a recognition that the language and the culture of law enforcement can create dehumanization of people."

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

This is a long-awaited change that immigration advocates have been fighting for.

"The change in language really poses a new change where we're finally recognizing the humanity of these folks," said Edwin Valdez, rapid response coordinator with Sacramento Area Congregations Together.

This guidance is the latest effort by the Biden administration to revert anti-immigrant rhetoric by the previous administration and recognize this country as a nation of immigrants.

"When you have dehumanization of individuals, when you use words like 'illegal' or derogatory words to describe them, you're sort of giving the OK and green light to treat them as less than human," Cooper said.

In response, Customs and Border Protection says they will implement the guidance immediately in both external and internal correspondence and communications.

You can read the memorandum here.

Community Groups Criticize Access to Sacramento County Superior Court in Letter to Judges, Officials

By Crescenzo Vellucci
Vanguard Sacramento Bureau Chief

SACRAMENTO, CA – Charging nearly 40 percent of “caged persons” in Sacramento County are Black and suggesting “criminal legal outcomes (are) discriminatory and racist,” community health, religious and criminal justice reform advocates fired off a scathing letter this week to Sacramento County Superior Court – including dozens of judges – criticizing access to the courts.

The groups referenced a public notice sent late last week by the courts that established new rules for criminal courtrooms that have been open to the public for nearly a year via livestreaming – the video provided a full view of the goings-on inside the courts, seldom seen by those who are not defendants, lawyers or court personnel.

The pre-trial courts are important in criminal matters because about 95 percent or more of defendants settle their cases without trial in these hearings. News media – other than The Vanguard – seldom cover them.

“We propose that the Court adhere to the same guidelines of other public institutions—25 percent capacity and mask requirement,” the community groups said, and asked the Superior Court for a meeting to “understand how CARES Act funding was spent.”

“Our CourtWatch team is interested in how these public funds are being used to ensure courtroom policies, systems, culture that upholds the presumption of innocence, transparency, and fundamental democratic ideals,” they noted in the letter.

“Every year, nearly 40,000 people are arrested in Sacramento County for felonies and misdemeanors. Thirty-seven percent of caged persons are Black in a county where Black residents make up just 11 percent of the general population.

“This disparity suggests that the criminal legal outcomes, much of them facilitated and approved by our court system, are discriminatory and racist–intentionally or not,” the letter charged.

It continued, “For this reason, and with recognition of the damage mass carceral systems have imposed on poor, Black and Brown communities, and due to the disregard for the presumption of innocence standard, we refer to the Criminal (In)justice System.”

“This is a pivotal moment for Sacramento’s Superior Court to decide what direction it will take in terms of transparency and accountability. Last year, the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors declared racism a public health crisis,” the letter reads.

“This same crisis is made evident by the Court through the aforementioned barriers. Sacramento Superior Court’s choice is to continue that racist legacy, or set a precedent that is rooted in equity.”

The letter identified the authors as a “coalition of community and public health, faith-based, and system change experts who work as racial equity analysts and educators. Our interest is to work with you, our most independent and powerful body of decision-makers to create antiracist policies and protocols that by overwhelming evidence creates a safer, healthier and more economically sound Sacramento Region.”

The organizations are specifically asking for a continuation of live-streaming access – the latest Sacramento County Superior Court notice seemed to say that, for many courts, it would be discontinued.

“(E)nsure all court proceedings are live-streamed over YouTube so our families and friends can watch their loved ones. This feature should be made permanent even after COVID to allow maximum transparency over life-altering proceedings.

“The removal of this option begs the question–what patterns of discrimination lay hidden in Sacramento courts–that it cannot be wholly accessible and transparent to the public it serves?” the groups asked.

Additionally, they note that COVID-19 precautions for some court personnel should be ended, specifically judges and deputy district attorneys, and they should be required to be in the same courtroom as defendants.

“(G)iven that judges, the district attorneys, the public defenders, and sheriff bailiff, and all other court system actors received priority vaccinations, all court system actors should physically be in the same courtroom if the person accused is required to also be present,” the organizations noted.

“To date, judges and DAs were physically, and likely emotionally distant from courtroom proceedings as they attended remotely. Only the public and private criminal defenders have physically stood side-by-side with our loved ones as they stare at a computer monitor with the judge and DA at a remote location,” they added.

Finally, the missive to the county courts asked to “bring humanity to the criminal justice system” by allowing family members have appropriate and safe access to attend” hearings.

The court’s suggested “email lottery system” that requires email and internet access, “is a barrier to those who are low-income and people of color–evidence of the disregard for the disproportionately poor and persons of color who face arrest and court,” they said.

The high cost of downtown parking is troublesome, according to the letter, creating a “poll tax” on engaging in a system that is constitutionally protected.”

Another requirement of the courts requires all those attending court to disclose to law enforcement their name and reason for attendance. That is intrusive and irrelevant to COVID protocols, said the groups.

“This ask, regardless of the intent, has no legal standing and is rooted in a culture of intimidation. We take particular note of Sacramento’s law enforcement agencies’ legacy of surveillance and retaliation against Black and Brown communities,” they said.

“Sacramento’s residents look forward to seeing these changes that support a more fair and just court system for our families and communities,” the letter summarized.

The letter authors noted that “When our loved ones show up for their first court hearing at arraignment, they may have already lost their car, their job, and incomes for their families due to elapsed time and lack of communication access from arrest to arraignment.

“There they stand, in an orange jumpsuit in a steel cage. They are disheveled, disoriented, and confused about how the next two minutes of the arraignment hearing will additionally alter their life course, as well as that of their families and neighborhoods.

“The arresting officers, bailiff, clerk, judge and prosecutors work as actors in a system that perpetuates racist outcomes with rare disruption on behalf of our loved ones who  are expected to endure under the assumption of guilt. They are stripped of any dignity, wellbeing, and voice. In desperation, they figuratively prostrate themselves before the hall of justice–all before being found guilty of any crime.”

Alerting court officials that they’ve been watching the livestreams from the court, the groups said, “In our hundreds of hours of live YouTube Court watching…the DA, the Public Defender, and thousands of loved ones, our critique is NOT with the people (actors) involved in the criminal injustice system. People are doing their jobs.

“Therein lies much of the challenge. Harmful outcomes are consistent with current practices. We are interested in systems change that combats racism, delivers equitable justice, and produces real public safety for all,” they added.

The letter was signed by Ryan McClinton, Public Health Advocates; Kaleemah Muttaqi, Live Free; Betty Williams, Greater Sacramento NAACP; Gabby Trejo, Sacramento Area Congregations Together (SacACT); Kim Williams, Building Healthy Communities; Oussama Mokkedem, Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR); Khalil Ferguson, United CORE Alliance; Jim Keddy, Youth Forward; Courtney Hansen, Decarcerate Sacramento; Julius Thibodeaux, Advance Peace; Ruth Ibarra, NorCal Resist; Henry Ortiz, Community Healers; and Lynn Berkley-Baskin, Justice2Jobs Coalition.